Execution Of Juveniles Essay Research Paper Adult
СОДЕРЖАНИЕ: Execution Of Juveniles Essay, Research Paper Adult Punishment and Juvenile Justice Day after day in this country there is a debate going on about the death penalty and whether we as people have theExecution Of Juveniles Essay, Research Paper
Adult Punishment and Juvenile Justice
Day after day in this country there is a debate going
on about the death penalty and whether we as people have the
right to decide the fate of another persons life. When we
examine this issue we usually consider those we are arguing
about to be older men and women who are more than likely
hardened criminals with rap sheets longer than the height we
stand (Farley Willwerth, 1998). They have made a career of
crime, committing it rather than studying it, and somewhere
along the line a jury of their peers decided enough was
enough. They were handed down the most severe and most
final punishment of them all, death. Behind all of the
controversy that this issue raises lies a different group of
people that are not so often brought into the lime light,
juveniles. This proposes a problem entangled with another;
if we do decide to carry out death sentences, what is the
minimum age limit? Can we electrocute, lethally inject, or
gas any one who commits a crime that is considered capital?
In this paper the issue of capital punishment for
juveniles will be discussed, basically laying out a
comprehensive look at the matter. First we will briefly
look at the history of both juvenile justice and the history
of the death penalty in regards to juveniles. Secondly we
will take a short look at the two major court cases that
dealt with this issue in the United States. Next this paper
will present the factual statistics of the death penalty for
juveniles and also take a look at our country’s stance on
the issue in the international arena. We will then spend a
short time looking at some views on the juvenile death
penalty, reasons for the death penalty itself, and the
arguments for and against the death penalty for juveniles.
Lastly we will conclude with a few thoughts about the issue
and the implications that we might have to consider.
The history of the death penalty being imposed on
juveniles spans all the way back to almost the beginning of
our country. In 1642, Thomas Graunger of Plymouth Colony,
Massachusetts, was the first juvenile, to be sentenced to
death and executed in our country for a crime that he
committed (Executions, 2000). Since the start of capital
punishment (or the recording thereof) in 1608, there has
been around 19,200 executions in the United States of all
ages. Of that total number, experts believe approximately
356 of them were juvenile executions, meaning that the crime
that the individual was sentenced for took place before the
offender was eighteen years of age (Gonnerman, 2000). This
accounts for about 1.8% of all executions from the start of
capital punishment to present (Executions, 2000). Since
1973 there has been 196 death sentences handed out to
juveniles and seventeen of those have ended in actual
execution (Streib, 2000). Table 1 lists those seventeen
individuals that have been executed since 1973, their date
and place of execution, their race, and their age both when
they committed their crime and when they were executed.
The juvenile justice system was born in 1899 at which
time it was recognized as separate from the regular justice
system that dealt with adult offenders (Ricotta, 1988). At
the start, the stated objectives of the juvenile justice
system was “…to provide measures of guidance and
rehabilitation for the child and protection for society, not
to fix criminal responsibility, guilt, and punishment”
(Ricotta, 1988). By the stated objectives it would seem as
though rehabilitation would be one of the most important
goals of the juvenile system. So how are we able to decide
now that a teenager is past the point of rehabilitation and
deserves the final punishment? Or does the obligation to
“protect society” become more overwhelming and leave us with
no other option but to put someone to death? These are just
a few questions that one might ask about our present goals
in comparison to the initial goals that were established
from the start. Next we will discuss the two pivotal court
cases that set the precedent for our current juvenile death
penalty statutes.
William Wayne Thompson, only fifteen years of age, and
three older persons were all found guilty of first degree
murder back in December of 1983. He was convicted of
murdering his brother-in-law in a most “heinous, atrocious,
and cruel” (Ricotta, 1988) way. After the district court
decided that their was “no reasonable prospects for
rehabilitation” (Ricotta, 1988) it was decided that he would
be tried as an adult. The Supreme Court of the United
States had to decide whether he could then be subject to
adult punishment which brought up the question of the eighth
amendment’s “cruel and unusual punishment” clause. The
Court justified the use of adult punishment by coining a
phrase that was used often in the written opinions by the
Justices. They stated that the discretion would be left up
to judges to determine the “evolving standards of decency
that mark the progress of a maturing society” (Ricotta,
1988) since they could not resolve what the writers of the
Constitution explicitly meant by cruel and unusual.
In this case, Thompson vs. Oklahoma (1988), the
Justices concluded that fifteen year olds were not prepared
to assume the responsibilities of an adult (Ricotta, 1988).
To this day no state allows the death penalty to be
appointed to any person under the age of sixteen. The next
year in Stanford vs. Kentucky (1989), the courts emphasized
the notion that the eighth amendment does not prohibit
juvenile execution for those age sixteen or seventeen (Beck,
1999). These cases are the key events in the development in
this issue. There are also International laws that speak of
this topic.
Steven Hawkins, director of the National Coalition to
abolish the Death Penalty, quotes in the article Dead Teen
Walking that “[w]e should be embarrassed to find ourselves
in [the] company” (Farley Willwerth, 1998) of countries
such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, and Yemen.
These were the only countries outside the U.S. that still
used the death penalty for juveniles up until two years ago.
Currently, the U.S. is the only country in the world that
practices this punishment for juveniles (Streib, 2000). The
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(Gonnerman, 2000) and the United Nations (UN) Convention on
the Rights of the Child (Amnesty, 1997) both outlaw the
death penalty for persons under the age of eighteen. The
U.S. ratified the former in 1992 and has yet to ratify the
latter. The UN Convention goes one step farther than this
discussion and also outlaws life imprisonment without parole
or juveniles (Amnesty, 1997). The U.S. definitely does not
look good when it comes to this subject when compared to
other countries, countries that are known for human rights
violations, and countries that decided to ratify the
International law.
So who are the “kids” that are committing these crimes
that force us to be in this debate in the first place?
Almost all the juveniles given the sentence of death are
male, 98% of the total (Streib 2000). Two-thirds of the
juveniles are minority offenders (Streib 2000), 20% being
Latino and the other 43% are African American (Gonnerman,
2000). One statistic of particular interest is that 80% of
the victims of these juveniles are adults (Streib 2000), not
kids their own age.
As of June 2000, their were seventy-four juveniles
under death sentence, the majority of which are in Texas.
Texas houses 26 of these young felons, one third of the
national total (Whitman, 2000), and has executed nine of the
seventeen that have been executed since 1973. Besides the
seventy-four sentenced to die currently and the 17 that have
been executed since 1973, there have been another 105
adolescents that have their sentences reversed (Streib
2000). On an even more individual note, a study was
conducted in 1988 of fourteen juvenile offenders.
Conclusions showed that all the individuals had serious
psychiatric problems, twelve had been abused as children,
and only two of the young people had IQ’s above ninety
(Farley Willwerth, 1998). These similarities may help to
explain the reasons that some of the juveniles are awaiting
death, however this paper does not explore that issue.
The U.S. undoubtedly leads the world in juvenile
executions. Ten out of the nineteen juveniles to be
executed since 1990 have been in the U.S. (Gonnerman, 2000).
We average about ten death sentences per year according to
Victor Streib, the topics leading researcher (2000). There
are forty jurisdictions in the U.S. that allow capital
punishment at all; thirty-eight states, and the federal
government on the civilian and military side. Of these
forty jurisdictions nineteen allow the death penalty for
those sixteen and older (Promises, 1999), five for age
seventeen year and older, and the remaining sixteen states
only allow execution for adults, those eighteen and older
(Streib 2000).
Even though these statistics seem to be somewhat spread
out among the states the truth is that the majority of the
sentences are handed out by judges in three states; Texas,
who has already been mentioned as the leader in the juvenile
execution topic, Florida, and Alabama (Streib, 2000). And
the numbers will more than likely only rise. Between 1983
and 1998 the death sentencing rate for juveniles went up
124% (Beck, 1999) and with the surge of young violence
continuing and legislatures “getting tuff” on juvenile
crime, that number will only rise. We want to move on now
and look closer at capital punishment itself and its effect
on juveniles as a punishment or lack there of.
In a letter to Mr. Gerald Garrett, chairman of the
Texas board of pardons and paroles, Mr. Lois Whitman pleaded
that “…children and adolescents are different from adults.
They lack an adult’s experience, perspective, judgment,
maturity, and restraint” (2000). Mr. Whitman is the
Executive Director of the Children’s Rights Division and was
writing this letter on behalf of Gary Graham who was
sentenced to death at the age of seventeen. Many people
share this view that juveniles are at an age where they
should be held responsible for their actions, but punishment
as severe as death is too extreme. That may be the
viewpoint in Texas, however out in Los Angeles the tides
turn a bit. One citizen there believes that if a kid can
commit an adult crime they should face adult consequences
(Farley Willwerth, 1998). Out in Los Angeles they have a
problem that makes them feel a bit different about “innocent
little children.” Gangs often use young kids to go out and
be the “trigger pullers” because they know that the younger
kids might not have to face capital punishment (Farley
Willworth,1998). This shows two different sides to the coin
on how people view this issue and some of the differing
reasons.
In Beccaria’s often quotesd writing On Crimes and
Punishment, he gives us his foundational reason for
punishment; “[P]unishmnets and the means adopted for
inflicting them should… be so selected as to make the most
effacious and lasting impression on the minds of men with
the least torment to the body of the condemned” (1995). By
this definition we then ask the question, is death the least
possible means of correcting our juveniles? Later on
Beccaria goes on to give his view on the death penalty. He
believed that there were only two reasons to put one to
death; if after losing his freedom he still poses a threat
to the nation or if “his death is the true and only brake to
prevent others from committing crimes” (1998).
The Supreme Court in the ruling of the Thompson case
struggled with two key terms to try and justify capital
punishment for teenagers, retribution and deterrence. The
result of their assessment of these two ideas in
relationship to juveniles seemed to show that capital
punishment was not a very effective punishment. From the
retributive standpoint, the justices concluded that it could
not be applied to juveniles because of their potential and
capacity to grow and their lower standard of “culpability”
(Ricotta, 1988). From the deterrent standpoint, they
questioned whether a certain age would be more deterred than
another based on the assumption that teenagers do not really
engage in a cost-benefit analysis before they commit their
crimes (1988). Finally, the overall assessment, whether
inconclusive or not, was that without retribution and/or
deterrence, capital punishment “is nothing more than the
purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering”
(1998). Thompson’s sentence was eventually reversed and his
case set a precedent still in use today.
Victor Streib outlines a few arguments for and against
a juvenile death penalty in his collection of research. We
will look at a few of each starting with the arguments for.
The first argument is that the problem that we have with
teenagers committing homicide is much more severe than in
other countries (2000). Juveniles also do not respond very
well to punishment that is less harsh, forcing the need for
more intense corrections, which is the second argument. The
third reason deals with our political leaders and their
strong emphasis on “harsher punishments” (2000). The last
argument for the juvenile death penalty is simply that we
can not solve the root of the problem, the “societal
conditions which breed violent juvenile crime.” Therefore
we must try to correct the problem through the end result
which is punishment for the crime (2000).
The first argument against the juvenile death penalty
deals with the study that was mentioned above. Many of
these kids come from very bad backgrounds and therefore they
have not had the chance to grow up and mature and move on
from this difficult time in their life. The second reason
opposers hold is that kids of the age we are referring to
are not deterred from crime by the death penalty because
they have “little realistic understanding of death and
instead tend to see themselves as immortal” (2000).
Thirdly, opposers believe we must try and start at the root
of the problem and improve societal conditions and our
neighborhoods (2000). Lastly, another popular view comes
from the Thompson case where one justice commented that
“…executing [Thompson] eliminates all prospects of
rehabilitation and affords no more protection for society
than secured imprisonment” (Ricotta, 1988). This reason
basically charges the death penalty with giving up on our
youth and not offering the chance to reform themselves.
The youngest juvenile executed by the government was a
young boy in the country of Yemen (Executions, 2000). He
was only thirteen. And while this may seem out of touch for
our society we must look at the pros and cons of this issue
and evaluate our punishment of juveniles. If we do not, it
will be only a matter of time before our thirteen year olds
are so out of control to the point where a jury will vote
“yes” to take that boy’s life away. To date, the youngest
juvenile executed in the U.S. was Sean Sellers of Oklahoma.
He was executed in early 1999 for a crime he committed when
he was sixteen years old (Promises, 1999). With the
Presidential election coming up as well we need consider the
implications that might take place if the Governor of Texas,
the state that executes more juveniles than any other state
in our nation becomes elected. What will this mean for the
nation? This brief overview of the juvenile death penalty
should help awaken us to some of the issues and future
implications that are associated with this issue.
9f2
Amnesty International Press Release. (1997, June). United
States of America: Amnesty International outraged about
possible sentence against South African teenager in
Mississippi. Available: http://www.amnesty-usa.org/news/
1997/25102997.htm
Beccaria, C. (1995). On crimes and punishments and other
writings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, A. (1999, March). Background information: March 1999.
Available: http://www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org/council/march1999/
juveniles.html
Farley, C. Willwerth, J. (1998, January 19). Dead teen
walking. Time, 151, 50-56.
Executions of juvenile offenders. (2000). Available: http://
www.essential.org/dpic.juvexec.html
Gonnerman, J. (2000, January 5). Kids on the row. The
Village Voice [Online]. Available: http://www.villagevoice
.com/issues/0001/gonnerman.shtml
Promises broken: Children in conflict with the law. (1999,
December). Available: http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/crp/
promises/law.html
Ricotta, D. (1988). Eighth amendment-the death penalty for
juveniles: A state’s right or a child’s injustice. Journal
of Criminal Law Criminology, 79, 921-951.
Streib, V. (2000, June). The death penalty today: Death
sentences and executions for juvenile crimes January 1,
1973-June 30, 2000. Available: http://www.law.onu.edu/
faculty/streib/juvdeath.htm
Whitman, L. (2000, June 20). Bush should halt Texas
execution: Human Rights Watch letter to the Texas board
of
pardons and paroles. Available: http://www.hrw.org/press/
2000/06/board-ltr.htm